Performance evaluation of dual-energy CT and differential phase contrast CT in quantitative imaging applications

Purpose The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the quantitative material decomposition performance of the dual-energy CT (DECT) and differential phase contrast CT (DPCT) via numerical observer studies. Methods The electron density (rho e$\rho _{{\rm e}}$) and the effective atomic number (Zeff$Z_{{\rm eff}}$) are selected as the decomposition bases. The image domain based decomposition algorithms with certain noise suppression are used to extract the rho e$\rho _{{\rm e}}$ and Zeff$\text{Z}_{{\rm eff}}$ information under three different spatial resolutions (0.3 mm, 0.1 mm, and 0.03 mm). The contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR) and the numerical human observer model which is sensitive to the noise textures are investigated to compare the quantitative imaging performance of DECT and DPCT under varied radiation dose levels. Results The model observer results show that the DECT is superior to DPCT at 0.3 mm spatial resolution (300 mm object size); the DECT and DPCT show similar quantitative imaging performance at 0.1 mm spatial resolution (100 mm object size); and the DPCT outperforms the DECT by approximately 1.5 times for the 0.3 mm sized imaging target at 0.03 mm spatial resolution (30 mm object size). Conclusions In conclusion, the DECT would be recommended to obtain rho e$\rho _{{\rm e}}$ and Zeff$Z_{{\rm eff}}$ for the low spatial resolution quantitative imaging applications such as the diagnostic CT imaging. Whereas, the DPCT would be recommended for ultra high spatial resolution imaging tasks of small objects such as the micro-CT imaging. This study provides a reference to determine the most appropriate quantitative X-ray CT imaging method for a certain radiation dose level.

Automated summary

In this study, the quantitative material decomposition performance of dual-energy CT (DECT) and differential phase contrast CT (DPCT) were evaluated and compared via numerical observer studies. The results showed that DECT and DPCT exhibited different quantitative imaging performance under different spatial resolutions and radiation dose levels.