4.6 Article

OPTIMISE: a pragmatic stepped wedge cluster randomised trial of an intervention to improve primary care for refugees in Australia

Journal

MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA
Volume 215, Issue 9, Pages 420-426

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.5694/mja2.51278

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Partnerships for Better Health Scheme [APP1106372]
  2. Monash Health
  3. cohealth
  4. enliven
  5. Victorian Department of Health and Human Services
  6. Victorian Refugee Health Network
  7. NSW Refugee Health Service
  8. South Eastern Health Providers Association
  9. North Western Melbourne Primary Health Network
  10. South Western Sydney Primary Health Network
  11. AMES Australia
  12. Settlement Services International
  13. Royal Australian College of General Practitioners

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to investigate whether primary care outreach facilitation could enhance the quality of care for general practice patients from refugee backgrounds. The results showed that the intervention led to an increase in the proportion of refugee patients receiving Medicare-billed health assessments, but had limited impact on other aspects of care.
Objectives: To examine whether primary care outreach facilitation improves the quality of care for general practice patients from refugee backgrounds. Design: Pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial, with stepped wedge allocation to early or late intervention groups. Setting, participants: 31 general practices in three metropolitan areas of Sydney and Melbourne with high levels of refugee resettlement, November 2017 - August 2019. Intervention: Trained facilitators made three visits to practices over six months, using structured action plans to help practice teams optimise routines of refugee care. Major outcome measure: Change in proportion of patients from refugee backgrounds with documented health assessments (Medicare billing). Secondary outcomes were refugee status recording, interpreter use, and clinician-perceived difficulty in referring patients to appropriate dental, social, settlement, and mental health services. Results: Our sample comprised 14 633 patients. The intervention was associated with an increase in the proportion of patients with Medicare-billed health assessments during the preceding six months, from 19.1% (95% CI, 18.6-19.5%) to 27.3% (95% CI, 26.7-27.9%; odds ratio, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.42-2.50). The impact of the intervention was greater in smaller practices, practices with larger proportions of patients from refugee backgrounds, recent training in refugee health care, or higher baseline provision of health assessments for such patients. There was no impact on refugee status recording, interpreter use increased modestly, and reported difficulties in refugee-specific referrals to social, settlement and dental services were reduced. Conclusions: Low intensity practice facilitation may improve some aspects of primary care for people from refugee backgrounds. Facilitators employed by local health services could support integrated approaches to enhancing the quality of primary care for this vulnerable population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available