4.7 Article

Ultrasonication of beef improves calpain-1 autolysis and caspase-3 activity by elevating cytosolic calcium and inducing mitochondrial dysfunction

Journal

MEAT SCIENCE
Volume 183, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2021.108646

Keywords

Beef tenderness; Ultrasonication; Calpain-1; Calcium; Mitochondrial dysfunction; Caspase-3

Funding

  1. Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive [2019-670107-29177]
  2. Hatch Capacity Grant from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture [UTA-01383]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that ultrasonication improved beef tenderness by increasing the activities of calpain-1 and caspase-3. These effects may be achieved by increasing cytosolic calcium and inducing mitochondrial dysfunction.
The objective of this study was to investigate if ultrasonication of bovine longissimus thoracis et lumborum (LTL) steaks increases calpain-1 and caspase-3 activities, and if so, to explore the underlying mechanisms that trigger their activation. Post-rigor bovine LTL steaks were subjected to ultrasonication at 40 kHz and 12 W/cm(2) for 40 min and subsequently aged for 14 d at 4 degrees C. Ultrasonication improved beef tenderness (P < 0.05) without negatively impacting pH, color, or cook loss (P > 0.05). Improved tenderness in the ultrasonicated steaks was associated with greater degradation of titin, desmin, troponin-T, and calpastatin and increased calpain-1 autolysis and caspase-3 activity (P < 0.05). In addition, ultrasonicated steaks had greater levels of cytosolic calcium and reactive oxygen species and lower mitochondrial oxygen consumption rate (P < 0.05). These data indicate that improved beef tenderness following ultrasonication is, in part, a function of increased calpain-1 and caspase-3 activities, potentially by elevating cytosolic calcium and inducing mitochondrial dysfunction, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available