4.7 Article

Design and realization of cap-shaped cilia MEMS vector hydrophone

Journal

MEASUREMENT
Volume 183, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109818

Keywords

Vector hydrophone; MEMS; Cilia; Sensitivity; Directivity; Piezoresistor

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Develop-ment Project [2019YFC0119800]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China as National Major Scientific Instruments Develop-ment Project [61927807]
  3. National Natural Science Founda-tion of China [51875535]
  4. Fund for Shanxi '1331 Project' Key Subject Construction and Innovation Special Zone Project

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The cap-shaped ciliary vector hydrophone (CCVH) proposed in this paper shows excellent performance in low-frequency detection with increased sensitivity compared to previous designs. The simplified integration process ensures better performance, and the CCVH demonstrates effective detection of underwater ship noise.
Ciliary MEMS vector hydrophone (CVH) has excellent performance in low-frequency detection, however, there is still the problem of poor sensitivity in some applications. A cap-shaped ciliary vector hydrophone (CCVH) is proposed in this paper. The microstructure not only ensures the working bandwidth of the hydrophone, but also increases the sensitivity. A single integration process is adopted to complete the pasting of the cap-shaped cilia and the cantilever beam, requiring no complicated secondary cilia integration process. Firstly, a mathematical model is established for theoretical derivation, and then the principle is verified via COMSOL simulation. Finally, test results show that the sensitivity of CCVH can reach -182.7 dB at 1 kHz (1 kHz, 0 dB@1 V/mu Pa). Compared with the CVH, the sensitivity has increased by 14.4 dB. Concave point depth of 8-shaped directivity is beyond 30 dB, which indicates that CCVH has an excellent ability to detect underwater ship noise.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available