4.7 Article

A new tool wear condition monitoring method based on deep learning under small samples

Journal

MEASUREMENT
Volume 189, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.110622

Keywords

Small samples; Tool condition monitoring; Recurrence plot; Multi-scale edge-labeling graph neural network

Funding

  1. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LQ21E050003]
  2. Wenzhou Key Innovation Project for Science and Technology of China [ZG2021027]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research proposed a new improved multi-scale edge-labeling graph neural network (MEGNN) to enhance the recognition accuracy of DL-based TCM under small samples. By expanding each channel signal of a cutting force sensor to multi-dimensional data, the MEGNN method outperforms three DL-based methods (CNN, AlexNet, ResNet) in experiments.
Tool wear condition monitoring (TCM) is an important part of machining automation. In recent years, deep learning (DL) based TCM methods have been widely researched. However, almost DL-based methods need sufficient learning samples to obtain good accuracy, which is hard for TCM in terms of cost and time. In order to enhance the recognition accuracy of DL-based TCM under small samples, this paper proposed a new improved multi- scale edge-labeling graph neural network (MEGNN). Each channel signal of a cutting force sensor is expanded to multi- dimensional data through phase space reconstruction. Then, these multi- dimensional data are encoded into a gray recurrence plot (RP), and aggregated into a color RP, which is input to MEGNN to extract features for establishing a fully connected graph. Finally, the tool wear condition is estimated through the updated edge labels using a weighted voting method. Applications of the proposed MEGNN- based method to PHM 2010 milling TCM dataset and our experiments demonstrate it outperforms three DL-based methods (CNN, AlexNet, ResNet) under small samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available