4.7 Article

Improved calibration technique for two-probe setup to enhance its in-circuit impedance measurement accuracy

Journal

MEASUREMENT
Volume 185, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.110007

Keywords

Calibration techniques; In-circuit impedance measurement; Inductive coupling approach; Two-probe setup (TPS)

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF)
  2. Nanyang Technological University
  3. SMRT
  4. Corp Lab@UniversityScheme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paper proposes an improved calibration technique for enhancing the measurement accuracy of the two-probe setup (TPS) based on the inductive coupling approach at relatively high test frequencies. Experimental results indicate that the TPS using the proposed calibration technique maintains good measurement accuracy up to 10 MHz.
The in-circuit impedance is a key parameter to evaluate the health and operation of many electrical systems. The two-probe setup (TPS) based on the inductive coupling approach is preferred for in-circuit impedance mea-surement because it does not require physical electrical contact with the energized system under test. However, the existing calibration technique for the TPS degrades its measurement accuracy at relatively high test fre-quencies. To enhance the measurement accuracy of the TPS, this paper proposes an improved calibration technique. It considers the frequency-dependent effects of the selected calibration components so that the TPS can maintain good measurement accuracy even at relatively high test frequencies. Using an actual TPS as a test case, experimental results show that the TPS based on the proposed calibration technique maintains good measurement accuracy up to 10 MHz, whereas the same TPS based on the existing calibration technique exhibits significant measurement errors when approaching 10 MHz.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available