4.7 Article

A two-step method for additional mass identification in beam structures by measurements of natural frequencies and guided waves

Journal

MEASUREMENT
Volume 186, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.110049

Keywords

Structural health monitoring; Additional mass detection; Global-local methodology; Natural frequency; Guided wave

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [NJ2020019, NS2021048]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [12102184, U1933202]
  3. National Science Center, Poland [2019/01/Y/ST8/00060]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a two-step method for identifying additional masses in beam structures, using relative natural frequency change curves at the global level and guided wavefield imaging for local detection. The method successfully localizes additional masses on simply-supported beams, showing that RNFC curves caused by additional masses differ from those caused by cracks, requiring theoretical formulation and validation for identification.
This paper presents a two-step method for the identification of additional masses in beam structures. In the first step, relative natural frequency change (RNFC) curves are developed as an indicator for identifying the possible locations of additional masses at the global level. The RNFC curves based method allows detection of possible mass locations using natural frequencies alone and as such is a significant improvement over the state of the art. To further identify the precise locations of the masses, guided wavefield imaging is used for local mass detection in the second step. The two-step method is successfully applied for the precise localization of additional masses on a simply-supported beam. The paper firstly shows that additional mass-induced RNFC curves are different from those caused by cracks in beams. As a result, a theoretical formulation and validation of additional mass identification is needed and is the main novelty of the paper.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available