4.6 Review

Preoperative Management of Gastrointestinal and Pulmonary Medications: Society for Perioperative Assessment and Quality Consensus Statement

Journal

MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS
Volume 96, Issue 12, Pages 3158-3177

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2021.08.008

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Perioperative medication management is crucial for preoperative optimization but lacks literature guidance. SPAQI offers guidance based on literature and multidisciplinary consensus, aiming to provide practical recommendations for preoperative medication management.
Perioperative medication management is integral to preoperative optimization but remains challenging because of a paucity of literature guidance. Published recommendations are based on the expert opinion of a small number of authors without collaboration from multiple specialties. The Society for Perioperative Assessment and Quality Improvement (SPAQI) recognized the need for consensus recommendations in this area as well as the unique opportunity for its multidisciplinary membership to fill this void. In a series of articles within this journal, SPAQI provides preoperative medication management guidance based on available literature and expert multidisciplinary consensus. The aim of this consensus statement is to provide practical guidance on the preoperative management of gastrointestinal and pulmonary medications. A panel of experts with anesthesiology, perioperative medicine, hospital medicine, general internal medicine, and medical specialty experience was drawn together and identified the common medications in each of these categories. The authors then used a modified Delphi approach to review the literature and to generate consensus recommendations. (c) 2021 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research center dot Mayo Clin Proc. 2021;96(12):3158-3177

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available