4.3 Article

Optimal Design of Clearances of Cylindrical Roller Bearing Components Based on Dynamic Analysis

Journal

MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING
Volume 2022, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2022/4811914

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Funds of China [51805151]
  2. Key Scientific Research Projects of Colleges and Universities in Henan Province [19A460019]
  3. National Key Research and Development Project [2018YFB2000203]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a dynamic model of a cylindrical roller bearing and verifies the simulation results through experiments. A multi-objective optimization model for the bearing is developed using central composite experimental design and response surface method. After optimization, the maximum impact force, whirl deviation ratio, and power loss are reduced.
With the continuous advancement in bearing speed, bearing assembly clearance (pocket, radial, and guide clearances) has a particularly significant impact on dynamic characteristics of bearing. In order to improve its performance, it is necessary to generate an optimized design for assembly clearance based on dynamic analysis. In this paper, a dynamic model of cylindrical roller bearing has been put forth based on the variable step fourth-order Runge-Kutta method, while the simulation results have been verified by a high-speed bearing cage motion testing machine. Considering pocket, radial, and guide clearances as independent variables and maximum impact force, whirl deviation ratio, and minimum power loss as the objectives, a multiobjective optimized model of cylindrical roller bearing has been developed using central composite experimental design (CCD) and response surface method. After optimization, the maximum impact force was reduced by 9.26%, the whirl deviation ratio was reduced by 2.87%, and power loss was reduced by 1.45%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available