4.3 Article

In-Situ Observation of Initial Stage Cosmetic Corrosion Behavior under Wet and Dry Conditions

Journal

MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS
Volume 63, Issue 4, Pages 612-621

Publisher

JAPAN INST METALS & MATERIALS
DOI: 10.2320/matertrans.MT-C2021004

Keywords

in-situ; cosmetic corrosion; under-film corrosion; wet and dry; exposure test

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the cosmetic corrosion behavior of cold-rolled steel sheets without galvanizing and discovered that the progress of under-film corrosion consisted of 3 steps: red rust changing to black rust, corrosion progressing from the scribed part, and swelling behavior at the tip of under-film corrosion.
Steel Research Laboratory, JFE Steel Corporation, Fukuyama 721-8510, Japan It is well known that the types of automotive corrosion can be divided into perforation corrosion and cosmetic corrosion. Although the mechanism of perforation corrosion has been studied extensively, the mechanism of cosmetic corrosion has not yet been clarified. The authors investigated the cosmetic corrosion behavior of cold-rolled steel sheets without galvanizing with an in-situ observation device. After coating the samples by cathodic electrodeposition (ED), the sample surface was scribed with a cutter. Corrosion resistance was evaluated under cyclic corrosion test. It was found that the progress of under-film corrosion consisted of 3 steps. The 1st step occurs in the initial stage of the dry process in the 1st cycle. In this step, red rust gradually changed to black rust. The 2nd step occurs in the latter stage of the dry process, and under-film corrosion progressed from the scribed part. The 3rd step occurs in the wet process, and in this step, the tip of the under-film corrosion displayed swelling behavior. In the 2nd cycle, the 2nd step and 3rd step of the 1st cycle were repeated. Under-film corrosion progressed at almost the same rate as in the 1st cycle.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available