4.7 Article

Enhanced strength-ductility synergy achieved through twin boundary pinning in a bake-hardened Mg-2Zn-0.5Ca alloy

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2021.142239

Keywords

Bake-hardening treatment; Magnesium alloys; Solute segregation; Twin boundary pinning

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51625402, U19A2084, 52074132]
  2. Science and Technology Development Program of Jilin Province [20200401025GX, 20200201002JC]
  3. Program for The JLU Science and Technology Innovative Research Team (JLUSTIRT) [2017TD-09]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study discovered that twin boundary pinning is a new hardening mechanism in Mg-2Zn-0.5Ca alloy during bake-hardening, enhancing the strength-ductility synergy. The co-segregation of Zn and Ca atoms at twin boundaries effectively suppresses crack propagation, improving the material's ductility.
Bake-hardening (BH) processing is an efficient way to rapidly increase the strength of solution-treated Mg alloys, which is attributed to GP-zone strengthening or dislocation pinning caused by solute segregation. Here we report a new hardening mechanism of BH in Mg-2Zn-0.5Ca (wt. %) alloy, i.e., twin boundary pinning, which could obtain enhanced strength-ductility synergy, with a flow stress of-200 MPa (increased from-141 MPa) and an elongation to failure of-17% (increased from-12%). Microstructure analyses show that the co-segregation of Zn and Ca atoms at { 1012} twin boundaries can impede twin boundary migration, which effectively suppresses crack propagation and therefore improves the ductility. Meanwhile, the twin boundary pinning obviously in-creases strength in conjunction with the pinning effects of co-segregated Zn and Ca atoms at dislocations. Such a twin boundary pinning mechanism suggests that BH technique can be generally applied to develop high-performance Mg alloys with enhanced strength and ductility.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available