4.7 Article

Microstructure evolution and phase transformation in a nickel-based superalloy with varying Ti/Al ratios: Part 1-Microstructure evolution

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2021.142228

Keywords

Waspaloy; Ti/Al ratio; Microstructure; gamma' phase; M23C6 carbides

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lowering the Ti/Al ratio results in slightly smaller average gamma' size and higher volume fraction of gamma'. Moreover, gamma' in samples with low ratios retains spherical morphologies after long-term ageing compared to high ratio samples, which transform to cuboidal shape in later ageing stage due to higher lattice misfit. Clear M23C6 carbides coarsening at grain boundary and growth toward grain interior in lower ratio samples during ageing process.
Nickel-based superalloy Waspaloy is a promising candidate material applied in power plant components for higher operation temperatures. Trial alloys based on Waspaloy with varying Ti/Al ratios (2.14, 1.44 and 0.74) were produced. The microstructure evolution, mainly focusing on strengthening phase gamma' and grain boundary carbides, were investigated and compared in these alloys during thermal exposure at 800 degrees C for up to 10,000 h. It is observed that lowering Ti/Al ratio leads to slight smaller average gamma' size and higher volume fraction of gamma'. Moreover, gamma' in samples with low ratios kept spherical morphologies after long-term ageing compared to high ratio samples, which transformed to cuboidal shape in later ageing stage due to higher lattice misfit. A clear M23C6 carbides coarsening at grain boundary and growth toward grain interior in lower ratio samples were also observed during ageing process. The results showed higher thermal stability of lower ratio samples in terms of gamma' morphology and volume fraction evolution. This was reflected by the slightly higher hardness values in lower ratio samples in later ageing stages.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available