4.6 Article

Developing high strength poly(L-lactic acid) nanofiber yarns for biomedical textile materials: A comparative study of novel nanofiber yarns and traditional microfiber yarns

Journal

MATERIALS LETTERS
Volume 300, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2021.130229

Keywords

Biomaterials; Nanofibrous textiles; Biocompatibility; Mechanical behavior; Biomedical application

Funding

  1. Shandong Science Foundation for Young Scholar [ZR2020QE090]
  2. Startup Grant of Qingdao University
  3. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFB03098052]
  4. Shandong Provincial Key Research and Development Program, China [2018GGX108003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Development of ultra-strong and biocompatible nanofiber yarns for biomedical textile materials presents significant challenges. PLLA nanofiber yarns exhibit exciting mechanical properties and enhanced biocompatibility compared to commercial PLLA microfiber yarns, showing potential for future commercial applications in bio-textiles.
Developing ultra-strong and biocompatible nanofiber yarns for biomedical textile materials remains major challenges. Here, poly(L-lactic acid) (PLLA) nanofiber yarns (NYs) were fabricated by using a modified electrospinning apparatus with a integration function of yarn formation and thermal stretching. Due to the highlyaligned nanofibrous structure and obviously increased crystallinity, the as-prepared PLLA NYs exhibited exciting mechanical properties, which matched those of commercial PLLA microfiber yarns (MYs). The biological tests demonstrated that the braided fabrics made from PLLA NYs presented obviously enhanced biocompatibility than those made from PLLA MYs, by significantly promoting the survival, adhesion and proliferation of human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hADMSCs). We hope that these results provide new insights for the future development of nanofibrous bio-textiles for commercial applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available