4.6 Article

Interplay between morphology and band gap energy in Fe-MIL-88A prepared via a high temperature surfactant-assisted solvothermal method

Journal

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
Volume 277, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.125536

Keywords

Metal-organic frameworks; Nanorods; Surfactant-assisted solvothermal synthesis; Band gap energy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, Fe-MIL-88A nanorods with narrow size distribution and well-defined morphology were successfully synthesized via microemulsion and surfactant-assisted solvothermal method. It was found that the electronic properties of MOF nanorods were dependent on their size and morphology.
Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs) are a new class of crystalline microporous solids with superior properties compared to their inorganic counterparts that offer a great variety of properties. Fe-MIL-88A is a biocompatible MOF with a flexible structure that can be synthesized in various morphologies via different chemical methods. The present study proposes two efficient methods, namely, microemulsion and surfactant-assisted solvothermal method, to prepare Fe-MIL-88A nanorods with narrow size distribution and well-defined morphology. The morphology, crystalline and chemical structure of the prepared samples were studied using FESEM images, XRD patterns and FTIR spectra, respectively, and their absorption behavior was scrutinized using UV-Vis spectroscopy. It was observed that MOF nanorods had size and morphology-dependent electronic properties. The band gap energy was inversely proportional to the particle diameter. While MOF microrods showed a single band gap of 2.63 eV, their nanorods showed two band gap energies of about 3.1 and 3.6 eV. Based on the obtained results, the application of MOFs with the desired size and morphology in the field of band gap engineering seems possible.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available