4.7 Article

First comprehensive ecological checklist of Brachyura in Korea: 1879-2020

Journal

MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN
Volume 171, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112742

Keywords

Crab fauna; Marine invertebrates; Macrozoobenthos; Decapoda; Biodiversity; Habitat diversity

Funding

  1. Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries of Korea (MOF), South Korea [20170325, 20210427]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study established an ecological checklist of Korean Brachyura through a meta-analysis, listing 247 species with key ecological information. The dynamic oceanographic settings of the South Sea seem to support high crab diversity, while rocky and subtidal habitats represent biodiversity hotspots. This study provides a useful baseline for further ecological information gathering of globally important marine taxa in Korea and elsewhere.
The increasing concerns and management needs on marine biodiversity have escalated the requirement for timely documentation of the marine taxa. We first established a comprehensive ecological checklist of Korean Brachyura through a meta-analysis of 74 documents (since the 1870s). A total of 247 species inhabiting the Korean coastal waters are listed with some key ecological information; habitat, substrate, distribution, and delta +. The crabs predominated on Jejudo Island, at the southernmost point of Korea, followed by the South Sea, West Sea, and East Sea. Portunus trituberculatus and Hemigrapsus sanguineus were cosmopolitan species widely distributed across the three seas. Dynamic oceanographic settings of the South Sea, such as archipelago, Rias coast, varied habitats, and (in)direct influence of Kuroshio warm current, seemed to support high crab diversity. The rocky and subtidal habitats represented biodiversity hotspots. The present study would be a useful baseline for gathering further ecological information of globally important marine taxa in Korea and elsewhere.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available