4.6 Article

Formaldehyde and acetaldehyde exposure and risk characterization in California early childhood education environments

Journal

INDOOR AIR
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages 104-113

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ina.12283

Keywords

Child care; Children; Air; Exposure; Formaldehyde; Acetaldehyde

Funding

  1. California Air Resource Board (CARB) [08-305]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Little information is available about air quality in early childhood education (ECE) facilities. We collected single-day air samples in 2010-2011 from 40 ECE facilities serving children 6years old in California and applied new methods to evaluate cancer risk in young children. Formaldehyde and acetaldehyde were detected in 100% of samples. The median (max) indoor formaldehyde and acetaldehyde levels (g/m(3)) were 17.8 (48.8) and 7.5 (23.3), respectively, and were comparable to other California schools and homes. Formaldehyde and acetaldehyde concentrations were inversely associated with air exchange rates (Pearson r=-0.54 and -0.63, respectively; P<0.001). The buildings and furnishings were generally >5years old, suggesting other indoor sources. Formaldehyde levels exceeded California 8-h and chronic Reference Exposure Levels (both 9g/m(3)) for non-cancer effects in 87.5% of facilities. Acetaldehyde levels exceeded the U.S. EPA Reference Concentration in 30% of facilities. If reflective of long-term averages, estimated exposures would exceed age-adjusted safe harbor levels' based on California's Proposition 65 guidelines (10(-5) lifetime cancer risk). Additional research is needed to identify sources of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde and strategies to reduce indoor air levels. The impact of recent California and proposed U.S. EPA regulations to reduce formaldehyde levels in future construction should be assessed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available