4.7 Article

Evaluation of microplastic and marine debris on the beaches of Niteroi Oceanic Region, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil

Journal

MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN
Volume 175, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.113161

Keywords

Microplastic; ATR - FTIR; Marine plastic litter; Oceanic Region

Funding

  1. IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) [RLA7025]
  2. CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico) [149052/2017-0, 302112/2018-9]
  3. FAPERJ (Fundacao Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro) [E26/202.794/2017, E-26/010.101100/2018]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The characterization of microplastics improves sustainable management practices in aquatic ecosystems affected by plastic litter, emphasizing the importance of reverse logistics and the value chain for packaging materials.
The characterization of microplastics helps to improve sustainable management practices in aquatic ecosystems impacted by plastic litter. Plastic litter and microplastics from four ocean beaches in the Niteroi municipality was evaluated in winter and summer. The collection and preparation of microplastic sample procedures followed on the protocol developed by the RLA7025 Project of the International Atomic Energy Agency. Marine debris followed to the United Nations Environment Program protocol. The polymer was characterized by ATR-FTIR technique. The Clean Coast Index was used to determine the degree of dirt on the beaches. Polyethylene (43%) and Polystyrene (52%) were the most abundant microplastics. The plastic is the most abundant category; representing 85% in winter and 73% in summer. The main sources are related to the consumption of drinks and food. These results emphasize the importance of reverse logistics and the value chain for packaging material and the need for effective actions managing solid waste.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available