4.7 Article

Spatial and temporal distributions of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in sediments from the Canadian Arctic Archipelago

Journal

MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN
Volume 171, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112729

Keywords

Canadian Arctic Archipelago; Sediments; Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; Baseline; Source; Risk assessment

Funding

  1. ArcticNet (a Network of Centres of Excellence Canada)
  2. Quebec-Ocean
  3. CREATE ArcTrain program
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  5. Fonds de recherche du Quebec -Nature et technologies (FRQ-NT) MSc scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study of marine and on-land sediment samples from the Canadian Arctic Archipelago revealed low concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), mainly originating from natural petrogenic sources and posing a low ecological risk.
The concentrations of 23 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs; 16 parent and 7 alkylated PAHs) were determined in 113 surface marine sediment samples, 13 on-land sediment samples and 8 subsampled push cores retrieved from the Canadian Arctic Archipelago (CAA). PAHs were extracted via accelerated solvent extraction and quantified via gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The sums of the concentrations of 16 priority PAHs in the surface sediments ranged from 7.8 to 247.7 ng g(-1) (dry weight basis, dw). The PAH inputs to the sediments have remained constant during the last century. Source-diagnostic ratios and statistical analysis suggest that the PAHs in the CAA mainly originate from natural petmgenic sources, with some pyrogenic sources. Temporal trends did not indicate major source shifts and largely indicated petmgenic inputs. Overall, the sediments retrieved from the CAA have low PAH concentrations, which indicates a low ecological risk for benthic or other organisms living near the water-sediment interface.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available