4.7 Article

Macroorganisms fouled in marine anthropogenic litter (rafting) arround a tropical bay in the Southwest Atlantic

Journal

MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN
Volume 175, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113347

Keywords

Marine anthropogenic litter; Marine environment; Fouled organisms; Ilha Grande Bay; Organisms

Funding

  1. CAPES (Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento Pessoal de Nivel Superior)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The presence of floating marine anthropogenic litter in marine environments increases the likelihood of fouling organisms using these substrates as a means of transportation. The study found that exposed beaches have higher density and cover of fouling, possibly due to currents, winds, and storm waves. Bryozoans, barnacles, polychaetes, and mollusks were the most common fouling groups observed in litter and could potentially contribute to the dispersal of species in the area.
The presence of floating marine anthropogenic litter in marine environments increase the possibility of trans-portation of fouling organisms using these substrates as a vector, mainly for those species with close affinities to artificial substrates. The objectives were to qualitatively and quantitatively report anthropogenic litter and its associated fouling groups arround Ilha Grande Bay (IGB). Litter was collected, classified and examined for the presence of fouling organisms on beaches located at two different levels of wave exposure during rainy and dry seasons. The types of litter do not differ among beaches, and the highest density and cover of fouling were re-ported on exposed beaches due the currents, winds, and storm waves. Bryozoans, barnacles, polychaetes, and mollusks were the most frequent fouling groups observed in litter and represents a potential vector for the dispersion of species in the IGB and adjacent coastal areas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available