4.7 Article

Toxic Alexandrium catenella expanding northward along the Chilean coast: New risk of paralytic shellfish poisoning off the Bio-Bio region (36 degrees S)

Journal

MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN
Volume 172, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112783

Keywords

Harmful algal blooms; Genetics; Paralytic shellfish toxins; Monitoring program; Pacific coast

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Since its first detection in 1972 in Chile's Magallanes Region, the toxic dinoflagellate A. catenella has shown an apparent oceanic range expansion from south to the north. In 2018-2019, A. catenella was detected for the first time in the northern areas off the Bio-Bio Region, marking the northernmost detection of this species on the Pacific coast of Chile. This discovery has important implications for species monitoring and governmental management in the Bio-Bio Region.
In Chile, the toxic dinoflagellate A. catenella shows an apparent oceanic range expansion from south to the north since its first detection in 1972 in the Magallanes Region (56 degrees S). Until 2017, A. catenella detections were restricted to a geographic area between Magallanes to Los Rios Regions (40 degrees S). The establishment of a monitoring program in the offshore Pacific coast allowed the detection of A. catenella between 2018 and 2019 in northern areas off the Bio-Bio Region (36 degrees S). Monoclonal cultures established from the Bio-Bio coast were genetically identified, and PSTs screened. Phylogenetic analyses determined that the Bio-Bio isolates aggregated in Group I ribotype (previously A. tamarense or A. fundyense) and the presence of PSTs analogs were confirmed. It is the northernmost detection of the toxic dinoflagellate A. catenella in the Pacific coast of Chile. These results have important implications for species monitoring and governmental management in the Bio-Bio Region.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available