4.7 Article

Spatial variations and potential risks of heavy metals in sediments of Yueqing Bay, China

Journal

MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN
Volume 173, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112983

Keywords

Heavy metal; Sediment; Risk assessment; Multivariate analysis techniques

Funding

  1. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LQ21C030006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study assessed spatial variations and potential risks of heavy metals in sediments of Yueqing Bay by examining the relationship between metal concentrations and sediment physiochemical factors. Higher sediment metal concentrations were found in the inner bay compared to the central and outer bay, with some metals posing moderate ecological risks. Multivariate statistical analysis suggested that sediment texture, total organic carbon, and petroleum hydrocarbons had a significant influence on the distribution and fate of metals.
In this study, we determined the spatial variations and potential risks of heavy metals in the sediments of Yueqing Bay by assessing the relationship between metal concentrations and sediment physiochemical factors. We found higher sediment metal concentrations in the inner bay than in the central and outer bay, particularly with respect to Hg, Cu, and Pb concentrations. According to the sediment quality guidelines, the heavy metals had a toxicity incidence probability of 21%. Assessments of heavy metal contamination using the geoaccumulation index and potential ecological risk index suggest that Cr, As, Pb, and Hg likely pose low ecological risks, while Cu, Zn, and Cd were identified as priority pollutants and may pose moderate ecological risks to the ecosystem. Multivariate statistical analysis inferred the high influence of sediment texture, total organic carbon (TOC), and petroleum hydrocarbons (PHCs) on the distribution and fate of metals in sediment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available