4.7 Article

Food Delivery Service and Restaurant: Friend or Foe?

Journal

MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Volume 68, Issue 9, Pages 6539-6551

Publisher

INFORMS
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2021.4245

Keywords

food delivery; on-demand economy; service operations; omnichannel operations; queueing economics; channel coordination; revenue-sharing contract; labor welfare

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [RGPIN-2015-06757, RGPIN-2021-04295, 7200664]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the long-term impact of food delivery services on the restaurant industry. The findings suggest that food delivery platforms do not necessarily increase demand but rather change the composition of customers. Paying the platform for bringing in customers may harm the restaurant's profitability. Coordination through appropriate revenue-sharing contracts can create a win-win situation. Surprisingly, when the food delivery service is convenient and the delivery-worker pool is large, more customers having access to the service may hurt the platform and society.
With food delivery services, customers can hire delivery workers to pick up food on their behalf. To investigate the long-term impact of food delivery services on the restaurant industry, we model a restaurant serving food to customers as a stylized single-server queue with two streams of customers. One stream consists of tech-savvy customers who have access to a food delivery service platform. The other stream consists of traditional customers who are not able to use a food delivery service and only walk in by themselves. We study a Stackelberg game, in which the restaurant first sets the food price; the food delivery platform then sets the delivery fee; and, last, rational customers decide whether to walk in, balk, or use a food delivery service if they have access to one. If the restaurant has a sufficiently large established base of traditional customers, we show that the food delivery platform does not necessarily increase demand but may just change the composition of customers, as the segment of tech-savvy customers grows. Hence, paying the platform for bringing in customers may hurt the restaurant's profitability. We demonstrate that either a one-way revenue-sharing contract with a price ceiling or a two-way revenue-sharing contract can coordinate the system and create a win-win situation. Furthermore, under conditions of no coordination between the restaurant and the platform, we show, somewhat surprisingly, that more customers having access to a food delivery service may hurt the platform itself and the society, when the food delivery service is sufficiently convenient, and the delivery-worker pool is large enough. This is because the restaurant can become a delivery-only kitchen and raise its food price by focusing on food-delivery customers only, leaving little surplus for the platform. This implies that limiting the number of delivery workers can provide a simple yet effective means for the platformto improve its own profitability while benefiting social welfare.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available