4.2 Article

Deep learning for automatic segmentation of thigh and leg muscles

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10334-021-00967-4

Keywords

Deep learning; Muscle segmentation; Magnetic resonance imaging

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry of Health [RF 2016-02362914]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study successfully implemented automatic segmentation of selected muscles of the thigh and leg through a supervised deep learning approach, achieving high accuracy. The results hold promise for application to different skeletal muscle groups and other MRI sequences with varying contrast and resolution.
Objective In this study we address the automatic segmentation of selected muscles of the thigh and leg through a supervised deep learning approach. Material and methods The application of quantitative imaging in neuromuscular diseases requires the availability of regions of interest (ROI) drawn on muscles to extract quantitative parameters. Up to now, manual drawing of ROIs has been considered the gold standard in clinical studies, with no clear and universally accepted standardized procedure for segmentation. Several automatic methods, based mainly on machine learning and deep learning algorithms, have recently been proposed to discriminate between skeletal muscle, bone, subcutaneous and intermuscular adipose tissue. We develop a supervised deep learning approach based on a unified framework for ROI segmentation. Results The proposed network generates segmentation maps with high accuracy, consisting in Dice Scores ranging from 0.89 to 0.95, with respect to ground truth manually segmented labelled images, also showing high average performance in both mild and severe cases of disease involvement (i.e. entity of fatty replacement). Discussion The presented results are promising and potentially translatable to different skeletal muscle groups and other MRI sequences with different contrast and resolution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available