4.5 Article

An anthropomorphic pelvis phantom for MR-guided prostate interventions

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 87, Issue 3, Pages 1605-1612

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29043

Keywords

pelvis; phantom; prostate; interventions; multimodal

Funding

  1. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung [13GW0388A, 13GW0389C]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The pelvis phantom designed for MR-guided prostate interventions successfully mimics human anatomy and has realistic imaging properties for MRI, CT, and US. In a targeted inbore MR-guided biopsy, a prostate lesion was accurately hit with a 3.5 mm accuracy. The experiment highlighted the realistic limitation of rectum size for needle placements.
Purpose To design and manufacture a pelvis phantom for magnetic resonance (MR)-guided prostate interventions, such as MRGB (MR-guided biopsy) or brachytherapy seed placement. Methods The phantom was designed to mimic the human pelvis incorporating bones, bladder, prostate with four lesions, urethra, arteries, veins, and six lymph nodes embedded in ballistic gelatin. A hollow rectum enables transrectal access to the prostate. To demonstrate the feasibility of the phantom for minimal invasive MRI-guided interventions, a targeted inbore MRGB was performed. The needle probe was rectally inserted and guided using an MRI-compatible remote controlled manipulator (RCM). Results The presented pelvis phantom has realistic imaging properties for MR imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US). In the targeted inbore MRGB, a prostate lesion was successfully hit with an accuracy of 3.5 mm. The experiment demonstrates that the limited size of the rectum represents a realistic impairment for needle placements. Conclusion The phantom provides a valuable platform for evaluating the performance of MRGB systems. Interventionalists can use the phantom to learn how to deal with challenging situations, without risking harm to patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available