4.7 Article

Anionic Ring-Opening Polymerizations of N-Sulfonylaziridines in Ionic Liquids

Journal

MACROMOLECULES
Volume 55, Issue 2, Pages 623-629

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.1c01885

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Department of Energy [DE-SC0020282]
  2. University of Alabama
  3. NSF MRI program [CHE1919906]
  4. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0020282] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study explores the anionic ring-opening polymerization of sulfonylaziridines in ionic liquids. In imidazolium ILs, the polymerization is not controlled due to poor solubility and solvent-transfer reactions, while in phosphonium ILs, it is controlled and living, allowing for sequential block copolymer synthesis. The slower polymerization rates in ILs compared to traditional polar solvents like DMF may be attributed to better monomer/anion organization in DMF and poorer mobilities in ILs.
The anionic ring-opening polymerization (AROP) of sulfonylaziridines in ionic liquids (ILs) is reported. In imidazolium ILs, the polymerization of 2-methyl-N-tosylaziridine (TsMAz) is not controlled due to poor solubility at higher degrees of polymerization and apparent solventtransfer reactions. In the phosphonium IL [P-6,P-6,P-6,P-14][Tf2N], the polymerization of TsMAz is controlled and living, and capable of sequential block copolymer synthesis. The polymerization of TsMAz is first-order with respect to monomer in ILs, with rates slower than observed in traditional aprotic polar solvents (e.g., DMF). Molecular dynamics simulations were used to compare DMF vs IL solutions consisting of BuN(K)Ts (as a model for the propagating chain end). The molecular dynamics simulations suggest better monomer/anion organization in DMF and poorer mobilities in the ILs; both are consistent with observed reduction in polymerization rates in the ILs compared to DMF.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available