4.7 Article

Bayesian optimization with partially specified queries

Journal

MACHINE LEARNING
Volume 111, Issue 3, Pages 1019-1048

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10994-021-06079-3

Keywords

Bayesian optimization; multi-armed bandit; Thompson sampling

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [20H04244, 21K11747]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21K11747, 20H04244] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bayesian optimization (BO) is a method for optimizing expensive and difficult-to-evaluate black-box functions, but specifying values for all input variables can be challenging. This paper introduces a new approach called Gaussian process bandit problem, BO with partially specified queries (BOPSQ), which allows for only some input variables to be specified. Algorithms based on posterior sampling are proposed for known and unknown input distributions, with demonstrated effectiveness on test functions and real-world datasets.
Bayesian optimization (BO) is an approach to optimizing an expensive-to-evaluate black-box function and sequentially determines the values of input variables to evaluate the function. However, it is expensive and in some cases becomes difficult to specify values for all input variables, for example, in outsourcing scenarios where production of input queries with many input variables involves significant cost. In this paper, we propose a novel Gaussian process bandit problem, BO with partially specified queries (BOPSQ). In BOPSQ, unlike the standard BO setting, a learner specifies only the values of some input variables, and the values of the unspecified input variables are randomly determined according to a known or unknown distribution. We propose two algorithms based on posterior sampling for cases of known and unknown input distributions. We further derive their regret bounds that are sublinear for popular kernels. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms using test functions and real-world datasets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available