4.7 Article

Microbiological quality and safety of commercial fresh fruit and vegetable juices in Korea

Journal

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 152, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112432

Keywords

Microbial contamination; Fresh fruit juices; Fresh vegetable juice; Bacillus cereus

Funding

  1. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety [20162MFDS012]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study monitored the microbial quality of 100 fresh fruit and vegetable juices sold in Korea, finding varying levels of total aerobic bacteria, coliform, and yeast/mold in the samples. However, major foodborne pathogens such as E. coli O157:H7, L. monocytogenes, and Salmonella spp. were not detected, indicating potential safety concerns for these products.
Fresh fruit and vegetable juices that have not been pasteurized can cause foodborne diseases. Therefore, microbial quality monitoring of fresh fruit and vegetable juices sold domestically is necessary. Here, 100 fresh fruit and vegetable juices were purchased from online and offline stores in Korea and monitored quantitatively and qualitatively for general microbial quality and foodborne pathogens. Total aerobic bacteria (TAB), coliform, yeast/mold (Y/M), Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli O157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes, and Salmonella spp. were evaluated by the selective agar method. TAB were detected in 51 out of 100 samples at an average level of 4.21 +/- 1.10 log CFU/mL, and coliform and Y/M were detected in 39 and 52 samples at average levels of 3.24 +/- 1.13 and 3.47 +/- 1.12 log CFU/mL, respectively. E. coli O157:H7, L. monocytogenes, and Salmonella spp. were not detected in any of the tested samples, but B. cereus and S. aureus were detected in 12 and 1 samples, respectively. This study can be used as basic data for technology development to secure the microbial quality and safety of fresh fruit and vegetable juices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available