4.7 Article

Lycopene-loaded bilayer emulsions stabilized by whey protein isolate and chitosan

Journal

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 151, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112122

Keywords

Whey protein isolate; Chitosan; Bilayer emulsion; Lycopene; Antioxidant

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFD0400601]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study prepared a bilayer emulsion loaded with lycopene and found that a chitosan solution of 0.5 wt% concentration provided the best physical stability. Experimental results demonstrated that the bilayer emulsion provided better protection for encapsulated lycopene compared to a WPI monolayer emulsion.
In this study, bilayer emulsion loading lycopene was prepared using lycopene oil solution (0.8 wt%) as oil phase, whey protein isolate (WPI) solution (0.6 wt%) as the first layer and the chitosan solutions (0-1.50 wt%) as the second layer. The effect of chitosan concentration on droplet size, zeta (zeta)-potential and physical stability of the bilayer emulsion was evaluated and the bilayer emulsion stabilized by chitosan solution of 0.5 wt% concentration showed the best physical stability. In addition, the effects of environmental stress, pH and ionic strength on the bilayer emulsion were measured and the result proved that the bilayer emulsion could provide a better protection for lycopene encapsulated than the WPI monolayer emulsion. Besides, different antioxidants (oil soluble: oil-soluble tea polyphenol, ascorbyl palmitate and vitamin E; hydrosoluble: bamboo leaf flavonoid, D sodium erythorbate and vitamin C) were added into the oil phase, the first layer and the second layer of the lycopene bilayer emulsions, respectively. The physical characteristics, storage stability and light stability of the bilayer emulsion were then evaluated to determine the effects of antioxidants in different locations on the emulsion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available