4.7 Article

Incorporation of leek powder (Allium ampeloprasum var. porrum) in wheat bread: Technological implications, shelf life and sensory evaluation

Journal

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 153, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112517

Keywords

Leek; Dough rheology; Wheat bread; Mould-free shelf life; Sensory evaluation

Funding

  1. Agency for Innovation by Science and Technology Flanders [083276]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Incorporating leek powder into wheat bread negatively impacts dough rheology and bread quality, with changes in viscoelastic properties, lower bread volume, and coarser crumb structure. However, at lower levels, the sensory study showed that consumer acceptability was not affected, and the mould-free shelf-life of wheat bread remained unchanged.
In this study, the incorporation of leek in wheat bread was explored. Green leek leaves were dried with two techniques to obtain leek powder after milling. The air-dried and freeze-dried powders were incorporated into wheat flour at five substitution levels (0, 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2 g/100 g). The impact of leek powder on dough rheology, bread quality, sensory evaluation and mould-free shelf-life was investigated. Leek powder negatively impacted the mixing properties and significantly changed the viscoelastic properties of the wheat flour dough. At low levels, the dough was strengthened whereas at higher levels both dough resistance as extensibility decreased. Bread quality was also affected, resulting in lower bread volume and coarser crumb structure. The negative impact on dough and bread properties was more pronounced for freeze-dried powder. The result of the sensory study showed that wheat flour could be fortified by 1 g/100 g of leek powder without adverse effect on the consumer acceptability. Finally, the addition of leek powder did not impact the mould-free shelf-life of wheat bread.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available