4.3 Article

Statins enhance the chemosensitivity of R-CHOP in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Journal

LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA
Volume 63, Issue 6, Pages 1302-1313

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2021.2020782

Keywords

DLBCL; R-CHOP; statins; patient survival; chemosensitivity

Funding

  1. University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Support Grant from National Institutes of Health [P30 CA016672]
  2. Lymphoma Research Foundation (Career Development Award)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that the concurrent use of statins with R-CHOP chemotherapy regimen significantly increased the complete remission rate in patients with naive-treated DLBCL. Patients treated with medium or high intensity statins alongside R-CHOP had a significantly higher complete remission rate and progression-free survival compared to those treated with R-CHOP alone.
The beneficial effect of statins on the anti-lymphoma activity of the rituximab-based chemotherapy regimen is controversial. Here, we retrospectively reviewed patients with naive-treated advanced diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) receiving frontline R-CHOP, and for whom data regarding differential statins use was available at the time of initiation of treatment. We observe that patients treated with statins and R-CHOP experienced a significantly higher CR rate as compared to those who received R-CHOP only. We further show that patients receiving medium or high intensity statins and R-CHOP experienced a significantly higher CR as compared to those treated with R-CHOP. Six-year progression free survival was higher for patients who received medium or higher intensity statins as compared to low or no statins. The potential contribution of cholesterol pathway in doxorubicin sensitivity was supported by in vitro/in vivo studies. Our study suggests that targeting cholesterol-using lovastatin could be a therapeutic strategy to enhance responses to R-CHOP in DLBCL patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available