4.6 Article

A Model for the Structure of Adsorbed Layers at Solid/Liquid Interfaces

Journal

LANGMUIR
Volume 38, Issue 7, Pages 2267-2275

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c02921

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21872082, 21573133]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A thermodynamic model called the dynamic bonding equilibrium (DBE) model was developed to describe the structure of adsorbed layers, and its rationality was confirmed by experimental data. The model provides a feasible approach for obtaining information about the structure of adsorbed layers at solid/liquid interfaces.
Understanding the structure of adsorbed layers, including their composition (the mole fraction of sorbate, x(A)) and thickness (d(al)), is of great significance for revealing the nature of adsorption and guiding its applications. Many techniques have been used to estimate the structure of adsorbed layers of organics at solid/liquid interfaces. However, there is still a lack of feasible thermodynamic models to describe the correlation between the structure (more precisely, x(A) and d(al)) and the equilibrium adsorption amount (Gamma(e)). Herein, a thermodynamic model, called the dynamic bonding equilibrium (DBE) model, was developed on the basis of the adsorption equilibrium thermodynamics with an assumption that, at adsorption equilibrium, the sorbate and solvent within the adsorbed layer both exist in different bonding states. The DBE model relates x(A) and dal with Gamma(e) and thus can predict or describe the structure (x(A) and d(al)) of adsorbed layers from Gamma(e). Its rationale was confirmed by the literature-reported adsorption data of organics, including surfactants, proteins, and polymers, on hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces in water. This work provides a feasible approach for obtaining information about the structure of adsorbed layers at solid/liquid interfaces.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available