4.7 Article

Sustainable urban development indicators in Great Britain from 2001 to 2016

Journal

LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
Volume 214, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104148

Keywords

Urban structure; Spatial analysis; Composite index; Britain

Funding

  1. UKRI (ESRC)
  2. Ordnance Survey through the Data Analytics and Society Centre for Doctoral Training [ES/P000401/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Current planning strategies promoting suburbanisation and low built-up density areas tend to increase the environmental footprint of cities, while international and local government plans are increasingly targeted at making urban areas more sustainable. Urban structure plays a crucial role in guiding urban smart growth policies that promote sustainable urban environments and improve neighbourhood social cohesion.
Current planning strategies promoting suburbanisation, land use zoning and low built-up density areas tend to increase the environmental footprint of cities. In the last decades, international and local government plans are increasingly targeted at making urban areas more sustainable. Urban structure has been proved to be an important factor guiding urban smart growth policies that promote sustainable urban environments and improve neighbourhood social cohesion. This paper draws on a series of unique historical datasets obtained from Ordnance Survey, covering the largest British urban areas over the last 15 years (2001-2016) to develop a set of twelve indicators and a composite Sustainable Urban Development Index to quantitatively measure and assess key built environment features and their relative change compared to other areas at each point in time based on regular 1 km(2) grids. The results show that there is a relative increase in urban structure sustainability of areas in and around city centres and identify that the primary built environment feature driving these improvements was an increase in walkable spaces.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available