4.7 Review

Street view imagery in urban analytics and GIS: A review

Journal

LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
Volume 215, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104217

Keywords

Urban data science; Urban planning; Built environment; Deep learning; Remote sensing; Ground-level

Funding

  1. National University of Singapore [R-295-000-171-133]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Street view imagery has become an integral component of urban analytics and GIScience, with applications ranging from analyzing vegetation and transportation to health and socio-economic studies. Most research currently relies on data from Google Street View. A notable trend is the use of crowdsourced street view imagery to enhance geographical coverage and temporal granularity in some cases.
Street view imagery has rapidly ascended as an important data source for geospatial data collection and urban analytics, deriving insights and supporting informed decisions. Such surge has been mainly catalysed by the proliferation of large-scale imagery platforms, advances in computer vision and machine learning, and availability of computing resources. We screened more than 600 recent papers to provide a comprehensive systematic review of the state of the art of how street-level imagery is currently used in studies pertaining to the built environment. The main findings are that: (i) street view imagery is now clearly an entrenched component of urban analytics and GIScience; (ii) most of the research relies on data from Google Street View; and (iii) it is used across myriads of domains with numerous applications - ranging from analysing vegetation and transportation to health and socio-economic studies. A notable trend is crowdsourced street view imagery, facilitated by services such as Mapillary and KartaView, in some cases furthering geographical coverage and temporal granularity, at a permissive licence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available