4.7 Article

The financial impact of street-level greenery on New York commercial buildings

Journal

LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
Volume 214, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104162

Keywords

Street greenery; Google street view; Hedonic valuation; Commercial real estate

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research demonstrates that urban street-level greenery has various benefits and is correlated with increases in property prices. In New York City, street-level greenery has a positive impact on commercial real estate prices.
Urban street-level greenery is empirically documented to improve mental and physical health, increase productivity, increase urban environmental equality and reduce carbon footprints. In addition, these benefits raise residents' welfare, which has been correlated with increases in residential house prices. We measure street-level greenness in New York City through a novel Green View Index (GVI) using Google Street View images, and assess the impacts of greenness on commercial real estate prices. Using a sample of office transactions, we spatially correlate Google Street View Images for New York City over the 2010 to 2017 period. We find an 8.9% to 10.5% statistically, economically and positive transaction premium and a 5.6% to 7.8% rent premium for offices with low to high street-level greenness relative to those building transactions spatially correlated with very low greenness. Estimations are robust t with proximity to parks, subway stations, sidewalk widths, household income levels and investments by Building Improvement Districts, as well as other vital and standard office valuation features. By documenting the role of greenery in commercial building valuations, our results give a more complete understanding of the value of greenness in urban environments, as well as the economic role that urban landscape architecture, planning and development has upon cities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available