4.7 Article

Efficacy and safety of co-administered ivermectin and albendazole in school-aged children and adults infected with Trichuris trichiura in Cote d'Ivoire, Laos, and Pemba Island, Tanzania: a double-blind, parallel-group, phase 3, randomised controlled trial

Journal

LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages 123-135

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00421-7

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1153928]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study conducted a randomized controlled trial in multiple countries, suggesting that the co-administered ivermectin-albendazole treatment is more effective against trichuriasis compared to albendazole monotherapy.
Background Preventive chemotherapy with albendazole or mebendazole remains one of the cornerstones of soiltransmitted helminth control. However, these drugs are less effective against Trichuris trichiura. Combined ivermectin-albendazole is a promising treatment alternative, yet robust evidence is lacking. We aimed to demonstrate superiority of co-administered ivermectin-albendazole over albendazole monotherapy in three distinct epidemiological settings. Methods We conducted a double-blind, parallel-group, phase 3, randomised controlled trial in community members aged 6-60 years infected with T trichiura in Cote d'Ivoire, Laos, and Pemba Island, Tanzania, between Sept 26, 2018, and June 29, 2020. Participants with at least 100 T trichiura eggs per g of stool at baseline were randomly assigned (1:1) using computer-generated randomisation sequences in varying blocks of four, six, and eight, stratified by baseline T trichiura infection intensity, to orally receive either a single dose of ivermectin (200 mu g/kg) plus albendazole (400 mg) or albendazole (400 mg) plus placebo. Patients, field staff, and outcome assessors were masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was cure rate against T trichiura, defined as the proportion of participants with no eggs in their faeces 14-21 days after treatment, assessed by Kato-Katz thick smears, and analysed in the available-case population according to intention-to-treat principles. Safety was a secondary outcome and was assessed 3 h and 24 h after drug administration. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT03527732. Findings Between Sept 13 and Dec 18, 2019, Jan 12 and April 5, 2019, and Sept 26 and Nov 5, 2018, 3737, 3694, and 1435 community members were screened for trial eligibility in Cote d'Ivoire, Laos, and Pemba Island, respectively. In Cate d'Ivoire, Laos, and Pemba Island, 256, 274, and 305 participants, respectively, were randomly assigned to the albendazole group, and 255, 275, and 308, respectively, to the ivermectin-albendazole group. Primary outcome data were available for 722 participants treated with albendazole and 733 treated with ivermectin-albendazole. Ivermectin- albendazole showed significantly higher cure rates against T trichiura than albendazole in Laos (66% [140 of 213] vs 8% [16 of 194]; difference 58 percentage points, 95% CI 50 to 65, p<0 - 0001) and Pemba Island (49% [140 of 288] vs 6% [18 of 293], 43 percentage points, 36 to 49, p<0.0001) but had similar efficacy in Cote d'Ivoire (14% [32 of 232] vs 10% [24 of 235], 4 percentage points, -2 to 10, p=0.24). No serious adverse events were reported; observed events were mostly classified as mild (95% [266 of 279] in the albendazole group and 91% [288 of 317] in the ivennectin- albendazole group), and all were transient in nature. Interpretation Treatment with ivermectin-albendazole resulted in higher efficacy against trichuriasis than albendazole alone in Laos and Pemba Island but not in Cote d'Ivoire. We recommend implementation of this combination therapy for soil-transmitted helminth control in countries with high T trichiura prevalence and proven enhanced efficacy of this treatment, particularly where ivermectin is beneficial against other endemic helminthiases. Copyright (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available