4.7 Article

A fully integrated SNP genotyping system for hereditary hearing-loss detection

Journal

LAB ON A CHIP
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages 697-708

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1lc00805f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31870853, 22074078, 82161138004]
  2. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [7202097]
  3. Beijing Nova Program 2020

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study developed a fully integrated SNP genotyping system for identifying hereditary hearing loss-related genetic markers from human whole blood within 3 hours. The system showed accuracy and stability in genetic screening of inherited hearing loss, with 100% concordance with Sanger sequencing results.
Hereditary hearing loss is one of the most common human neurosensory disorders, and there is a great need for early intervention methods such as genetically screening newborns. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are the major genetic targets for hearing-loss screening. In this study, a fully integrated SNP genotyping system was constructed to identify hereditary hearing loss-related genetic markers from human whole blood. The entire detection process, including blood cell lysis, nucleic acid extraction, the reaction mixture distribution, the chambers sealing and the two-colour multiplex competitive allele-specific polymerase chain reaction (KASP), can be automatically conducted in a self-contained cassette within 3 hours. To critically evaluate the performance of the system, its specificity, sensitivity and stability were assessed. Then, 13 clinical samples were genotyped with this fluidic cassette system to detect seven hotspot deafness-associated mutations in three genes (MT-RNR1, GJB2 and SLC26A4). The detection results of the cassette system were 100% concordant with those obtained by Sanger sequencing, proving its accuracy in the genetic screening of inherited hearing loss.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available