4.5 Article

Significant improvement after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement in women

Journal

KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages 2181-2187

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-021-06802-6

Keywords

Hip arthroscopy; Femoroacetabular impingement; Gender; Patient outcomes; Minimal clinically important difference (MCID); Patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS); Substantial clinical benefit (SCB)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to evaluate outcomes in women undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAIS and found significant improvements in PROs in women at 4-year follow-up. Differences between women and men in PROs and rates of achieving MCID, SCB and PASS were predominantly significant for iHOT-12 PASS.
Purpose This study was designed to evaluate outcomes in women after hip arthroscopy (HA) for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) and compare these results with men. Methods Retrospective study of a prospective database of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy between 2015 and 2018. Inclusion criteria were patients between 18 and 50 years of age, diagnosis of FAIS, complete clinical patient-reported outcomes (PROs), radiographic measurements, and underwent at least a 2-year HA follow-up. For each woman, two men underwent HA were matched in a 1:2 ratio based on age within 5 years, and date of surgery within 6 months. Diagnostic arthroscopy was performed to evaluate labral and chondral status. Radiographic evaluation, a self-administered Hip Outcome Score (HOS) questionnaire, with activity of daily living (ADL) and sports subscale (SSS), and a self-administered short version of the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12) were assessed at 6 months, 12 months, and then yearly. Clinical relevance was measured with the minimal clinical important difference (MCID), patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) for HOS-ADL, HOS-SSS, and iHOT-12. Results One hundred and eighty-five patients met the inclusion criteria. Fifty-two women were matched with 104 men. Significant differences in terms of demographics, radiographic results, intraoperative findings and arthroscopic procedures were found between women and men. Mean follow-up was 48.4 months in women and 50.2 months in men. Both groups showed significant improvement from preoperative PROs to the latest follow-up. There were no significant differences between groups in preoperative PROs, latest follow-up PROs and PROs improvements. The difference in frequency of patients achieving MCID, PASS, and SCB was only significant greater for iHOT-12 PASS in women compared with men. Conclusion Significant improvements in PROs in women after HA for FAIS at 4-year follow-up were found. Differences between women and men in PROs and rates of achieving MCID, SCB and PASS were only significant for iHOT-12 PASS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available