Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Minimal clinically important differences and substantial clinical benefits for Knee Society Scores
Alejandro Lizaur-Utrilla et al.
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY (2020)
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (Pain, Function, and Quality of Life) After Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
Ahmed Siddiqi et al.
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME (2020)
Minimal clinically important difference of commonly used patient-reported outcome measures in total knee arthroplasty: review of terminologies, methods and proposed values
Siddhartha Maredupaka et al.
KNEE SURGERY & RELATED RESEARCH (2020)
Implementing a Scientifically Valid, Cost-Effective, and Scalable Data Collection System at Point of Care The Cleveland Clinic OME Cohort
Nicolas S. Piuzzi et al.
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME (2019)
Minimal clinically important difference of commonly used hip-, knee-, foot-, and ankle-specific questionnaires: a systematic review
Derya Celik et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2019)
Meaningful changes in the Short Form 12 physical and mental summary scores after total knee arthroplasty
N. D. Clement et al.
KNEE (2019)
Have the frequency of and reasons for revision total knee arthroplasty changed since 2000? Comparison of two cohorts from the same hospital: 255 cases (2013-2016) and 68 cases (1991-1998)
Julien Pietrzak et al.
ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH (2019)
Minimal important change values for the Oxford Knee Score and the Forgotten Joint Score at 1 year after total knee replacement
Lina H. Ingelsrud et al.
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA (2018)
The Popularity of Outcome Measures for Hip and Knee Arthroplasties
Thomas M. Lovelock et al.
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY (2018)
MINIMUM CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE: CURRENT TRENDS IN THE ORTHOPAEDIC LITERATURE, PART II: LOWER EXTREMITY A Systematic Review
Anne G. Copay et al.
JBJS REVIEWS (2018)
The minimal clinically important difference for Knee Society Clinical Rating System after total knee arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis
Wu Chean Lee et al.
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY (2017)
Minimal important difference to infer changes in health-related quality of life-a systematic review
Ravishankar Jayadevappa et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2017)
The minimal clinically important difference raised the significance of outcome effects above the statistical level, with methodological implications for future studies
Felix Angst et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2017)
Projected increase in total knee arthroplasty in the United States - an alternative projection model
M. C. S. Inacio et al.
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE (2017)
The Role of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Value-Based Payment Reform
Lee Squitieri et al.
VALUE IN HEALTH (2017)
Bundled Payments in Total Joint Replacement: Keeping Our Care Affordable and High in Quality
Alexander S. McLawhorn et al.
CURRENT REVIEWS IN MUSCULOSKELETAL MEDICINE (2017)
Patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries: Report of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Working Group of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries Part II. Recommendations for selection, administration, and analysis
Ola Rolfson et al.
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA (2016)
Age and Preoperative Knee Society Score Are Significant Predictors of Outcomes Among Asians Following Total Knee Arthroplasty
Hamid Rahmatullah Bin Abd Razak et al.
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME (2016)
Variations In Good Patient Reported Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty
Amit Kiran et al.
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY (2015)
Meaningful changes for the Oxford hip and knee scores after joint replacement surgery
David J. Beard et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2015)
The epidemiology of revision total knee and hip arthroplasty in England and Wales A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS WITH PROJECTIONS FOR THE UNITED STATES. A STUDY USING THE NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY DATASET
A. Patel et al.
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL (2015)
Sample size used to validate a scale: a review of publications on newly-developed patient reported outcomes measures
Emmanuelle Anthoine et al.
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes (2014)
Why Are Total Knee Arthroplasties Failing Today-Has Anything Changed After 10 Years?
Peter F. Sharkey et al.
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY (2014)
A Novel Methodological Approach for Measuring Symptomatic Change Following Total Joint Arthroplasty
Amit Kiran et al.
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY (2014)
The minimal clinically important difference in the Oxford knee score and Short Form 12 score after total knee arthroplasty
N. D. Clement et al.
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY (2014)
Development of a patient-reported outcome measure of activity and participation (the OKSAPQ) to supplement the Oxford knee score
J. Dawson et al.
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL (2014)
What Are the Causes of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in Japan?
Yasuhiko Kasahara et al.
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH (2013)
被撤回的出版物: World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects (Retracted article. See vol. 135, pg. 2149, 2021)
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2013)
The Utility of Outcome Measures in Total Knee Replacement Surgery
Michelle M. Dowsey et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY (2013)
Reason for Revision Influences Early Patient Outcomes After Aseptic Knee Revision
Paul Baker et al.
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH (2012)
The Oxford Knee Score: Compared performance before and after knee replacement
J. -Y. Jenny et al.
ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH (2012)
Minimal clinically important differences in health-related quality of life after total hip or knee replacement A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
J. C. Keurentjes et al.
BONE & JOINT RESEARCH (2012)
Quality of Life Outcomes in Revision Versus Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
Nelson V. Greidanus et al.
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY (2011)
A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods
Madeleine T. King
EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH (2011)
Patient Satisfaction after Total Knee Arthroplasty Who is Satisfied and Who is Not?
Robert B. Bourne et al.
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH (2010)
Mind the MIC: large variation among populations and methods
Caroline B. Terwee et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2010)
Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve in Diagnostic Test Assessment
Jayawant N. Mandrekar
JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY (2010)
A 5 year prospective study of patient-relevant outcomes after total knee replacement
A-K. Nilsdotter et al.
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE (2009)
Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes
Dennis Revicki et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2008)
The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement - Data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales
P. N. Baker et al.
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME (2007)
Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after total knee replacement
A. Escobar et al.
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE (2007)
Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods
Anne G. Copay et al.
SPINE JOURNAL (2007)
Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance
HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES (2006)
The increasing financial burden of knee revision surgery in the United States
Carlos Lavernia et al.
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH (2006)
Changing demographics of patients with total joint replacement
Roy D. Crowninshield et al.
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH (2006)
Health-related quality of life and appropriateness of knee or hip joint replacement
JM Quintana et al.
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2006)
Share Paper
