4.5 Article

Social Health in the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbab138

Keywords

Longitudinal methods; Marriage; Social networks; Social support; resources

Funding

  1. National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health [R01AG043538, R01AG048511]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article presents the theoretical framework and measures of social health in the NSHAP project, discussing how researchers can construct common measures of social health and showing the distribution of social health indicators by gender and age in the 2015 NSHAP data.
Objectives In this article, we present the theoretical framework that guided the development of the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project (NSHAP) including the measures of social health. We discuss the literature that links social measures to other outcomes, and we discuss in detail how researchers might construct common measures of social health, including those that reflect social relationships, sexuality, social networks, social resources, and social participation. Methods The NSHAP includes multiple detailed measures of social health, collected in the rounds of data collection carried out in 2005, 2010, and 2015, allowing for study of changes over time and as people age among a nationally representative sample of the community-dwelling population of older adults in the United States. Results We define indicators of social health, describe measures of each in the 2015 round of NSHAP, and show the distribution of the measures by gender and age. We present scales of dimensions of social health that have been developed elsewhere and describe their properties. Discussion We briefly discuss the distribution of these measures by age and gender in the 2015 round of NSHAP. Simple analyses of these categorized measures reveal differences by age and gender that deserve closer attention in future investigations using the NSHAP data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available