4.7 Article

Experimental investigation on vortex-induced vibrations of a triple-box girder with web modification

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2021.104783

Keywords

Triple-box girder; VIV; Long-span bridge; Aerodynamic optimization; Wind tunnel test; Reynolds number

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of China [52025082]
  2. Hunan Provincial Innovation Foundation for Postgraduate, China [CX20190288]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This experimental study focused on the VIV of a triple-box girder with different web modifications and found that the linear-type web performed better in terms of VIV performance compared to the curved web. Increasing structural damping and turbulence intensity can help mitigate VIV. The geometric profiles and arrangement of appurtenant facilities on the girder have significant effects on VIV performance.
Split type box girder is a recommendable structural style for long-span cable-supported bridges due to its excellent aeroelastic stability. A major issue of this kind of girder is its susceptibility to vortex-induced vibration (VIV), which has not been adequately investigated. This paper presents an experimental study on VIV of a triplebox girder with three different web modifications (namely curved web and linear-type webs with different slopes). Both small- and large-scale sectional models were employed for wind tunnel tests considering the Reynolds number effect. Results indicated that the triple-box girder showed poor VIV performances in both construction and completed phases. Generally, linear-type web was superior to curved web in terms of VIV performance. Increasing the structural damping and turbulence intensity of incoming flow were helpful for VIV mitigation. Geometric profiles and arrangement of appurtenant facilities on the girder have significant effects on the VIV performance. Aerodynamic optimal schemes were proposed for VIV mitigation both in construction and completed phases. Obvious discrepancies in VIV responses were observed between the small- and large-scale tests for several scenarios. Possible factors being responsible for the discrepancies were Reynolds number, turbulence intensity, nonlinearity of model structural damping, blockage ratio and geometric accuracy of the sectional models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available