4.4 Article

Research on slow crack growth resistance of polyethylene pipe based on strain hardening modulus

Journal

JOURNAL OF VINYL & ADDITIVE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages 226-234

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/vnl.21885

Keywords

polyethylene; slow crack growth; strain hardening modulus; tie molecule

Funding

  1. Major Science and Technology Special Projects of China National Petroleum Corporation [2018E-19]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that the comonomer type and crystallinity of PE materials have a significant impact on the SH modulus, while the molecular weight distribution in the range of 1 x 10(3) to 1 x 10(5) contributes to the establishment of the crosslinked molecular network, and higher crystallinity and thinner thickness are beneficial for obtaining a higher measured SH modulus.
Slow crack growth (SCG) is the principal factor for determining the operating lifetime of polyethylene (PE) pipes. Exploring the relationship between the molecular structure and the strain hardening (SH) modulus is helpful to evaluate the SCG resistance of PE pipe materials accurately. This paper uses an efficient SH test method to study the SH modulus for four kinds of PE pipes. Meanwhile, the correlation between SH modulus and sample thickness, material crystallinity (X-c), comonomer type and content, weight-average molecular weight, and molecular weight distribution has been established and investigated respectively. The results represent that the comonomer type and the X-c of PE materials played significant roles in the SH modulus. The SH modulus of ethylene-hexene copolymer is 5-7 MPa higher than that of ethylene-butene copolymer. The amount in the range of 1 x 10(3) to 1 x 10(5) of the molecular weight distribution of PE materials has a significant contribution to the establishment of the tie molecular network. In addition, the higher X-c and the thinner thickness were beneficial to obtain the higher measured SH modulus.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available