4.1 Article

Anticoagulant profile of subcutaneous enoxaparin in healthy dogs

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jvp.13015

Keywords

factor Xa; heparin; hypercoagulability; pharmacodynamic; pharmacokinetic; thromboembolism

Funding

  1. Mississippi State University College of Veterinary Medicine Office of Research and Graduate Studies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to determine the optimal dosage of enoxaparin for dogs and establish measurement criteria for anticoagulant efficacy. By administering different dosages of enoxaparin to dogs and monitoring, it was determined that a dosage of 1.3 mg/kg subcutaneously every 8 hours could maintain anti-Xa activity within the desired range.
Our study objective was to identify a subcutaneous enoxaparin dosage that provided a consistent anticoagulant intensity in dogs. Our hypotheses were that a dose of 0.8 mg/kg would provide inconsistent anticoagulation, a higher dose would provide consistent anticoagulation over a greater duration of time, and viscoelastometry would effectively monitor the anticoagulant status. Six healthy dogs received two subcutaneous enoxaparin doses (0.8 and 2 mg/kg) for anti-Xa activity determinations and pharmacokinetic modeling. Based on calculations derived from these results, 1.3 mg/kg, SC, q8 h was administered for seven doses. Target ranges for anticoagulant intensity were defined as anti-Xa activity of 0.5-1 U/ml, and change from baseline of two viscoelastometric parameters: activated clotting time (Delta ACT; >= 40 s), and clot rate (CRpost; <= 20 U/min). Following an initial injection at 1.3 mg/kg, anti-Xa activity of 5/6 dogs reached or exceeded the target range. Following the final dose, anti-Xa activity reached or exceeded the target range in all dogs, and Delta ACT and CRpost values exceeded target for 2-6 and 4-12 h, respectively. At an enoxaparin dosage of 1.3 mg/kg, SC, q8 h, anti-Xa activity was consistently above the minimum threshold of the target range; however, the safety of this dosage remains to be determined.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available