4.5 Article

Machine Learning Algorithms for Classification of First-Trimester Fetal Brain Ultrasound Images

Journal

JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE
Volume 41, Issue 7, Pages 1773-1779

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jum.15860

Keywords

fetal cortex; first trimester; image processing; machine learning; nuchal translucency; ultrasound

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrates the feasibility of using machine learning algorithms to classify first-trimester fetal brain ultrasound images and lays the foundation for earlier diagnosis of fetal brain abnormalities.
Objective To evaluate the feasibility of machine learning (ML) tools for segmenting and classifying first-trimester fetal brain ultrasound images. Methods Two image segmentation methods processed high-resolution fetal brain images obtained during the nuchal translucency scan: Statistical Region Merging (SRM) and Trainable Weka Segmentation (TWS), with training and testing sets in the latter. Measurement of the fetal cerebral cortex in original and processed images served to evaluate the performance of the algorithms. Mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) was used as an accuracy index of the segmentation processing. Results The SRM plugin revealed a total MAPE of 1.71% +/- 1.62 SD (standard deviation) and a MAPE of 1.4% +/- 1.32 SD and 2.72% +/- 2.21 SD for the normal and increased NT groups, respectively. The TWS plugin displayed a MAPE of 1.71% +/- 0.59 SD (testing set). There were no significant differences between the training and testing sets after 5-fold cross-validation. The images obtained from normal NT fetuses and increased NT fetuses revealed a MAPE of 1.52% +/- 1.02 SD and 2.63% +/- 1.98 SD. Conclusions Our study demonstrates the feasibility of using ML algorithms to classify first-trimester fetal brain ultrasound images and lay the foundation for earlier diagnosis of fetal brain abnormalities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available