4.4 Article

Pulmonary embolism in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia on adequate oral anticoagulation

Journal

JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND THROMBOLYSIS
Volume 53, Issue 3, Pages 576-580

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11239-021-02589-y

Keywords

Pulmonary embolism; Infectious diseases; Anticoagulant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This report discusses five cases of patients on long-term oral anticoagulation therapy presenting with severe COVID-19 pneumonia associated with segmental acute pulmonary embolism. Despite adherence to therapy and adequate anticoagulant levels, the patients experienced thrombotic complications. Elevated levels of d-dimer, fibrinogen, and markers of inflammation were observed in all cases, supporting the hypothesis that severe viral infection may trigger local vascular damage leading to detected thrombi in the lungs.
Thrombotic complications are common in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia with important consequences on the diagnostic and therapeutic management. We report a consecutive series of five patients on long-term oral anticoagulation therapy who presented to our hospital for severe COVID-19 pneumonia associated with segmental acute pulmonary embolism despite adherence to therapy and with an adequate anticoagulant range at the time of the event. Four patients were receiving a direct oral anticoagulant (two with edoxaban, one with rivaroxaban and one with apixaban) and one patient a vitamin K antagonist. No significant thrombotic risk factors, active cancer, or detectable venous thromboembolism were present. In all cases, elevated d-dimer and fibrinogen levels with a parallel rise in markers of inflammation were documented. The combination of these findings seems to support the hypothesis that considers the local vascular damage determined by severe viral infection as the main trigger of thrombi detected in the lungs, rather than emboli from peripheral veins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available