4.6 Article

Human and mouse PAR4 are functionally distinct receptors: Studies in novel humanized mice

Journal

JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages 1236-1247

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jth.15669

Keywords

blood platelets; extracellular vesicles; platelet activation; protease-activated receptors; transgenic mice

Funding

  1. Cardeza Foundation for Hematologic Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found functional differences between human and mouse PAR4, including responsiveness and signaling pathways, highlighting the importance of considering these differences when interpreting mouse PAR4 studies.
Background Human and mouse platelets both express protease-activated receptor (PAR) 4 but sequence alignment reveals differences in several functional domains. These differences may result in functional disparities between the receptors which make it difficult to translate PAR4 studies using mice to human platelet physiology. Objectives To generate transgenic mice that express human, but not mouse, PAR4 and directly compare human and mouse PAR4 function in the same platelet environment. Methods Transgenic mice were made using a genomic clone of the F2RL3 gene (encoding PAR4) and backcrossed with Par4 KO mice. For certain experiments, mice were bred with GRK6 KO mice. Tail bleeding time and platelet function in response to PAR4-activating peptide were assessed. Results Human F2RL3 was successfully integrated into the mouse genome, transgenic mice were crossed to the mPar4 KO background (PAR4 tg/KO), and PAR4 was functionally expressed on platelets. Compared to WT, PAR4 tg/KO mice exhibited shortened tail bleeding time and their platelets were more responsive to PAR4-AP as assessed by alpha-granule release and integrin activation. The opposite was observed with thrombin. Knocking out GRK6 had no effect on human PAR4-expressing platelets, unlike mouse Par4-expressing platelets. PAR4 tg/KO platelets exhibited greater Ca2+ area under the curve and more robust extracellular vesicle release than WT stimulated with PAR4-AP. Conclusion These data suggest that (1) human PAR4- and mouse Par4-mediated signaling are different and (2) the feedback regulation mechanisms of human and mouse PAR4 are different. These functional differences are important to consider when interpreting PAR4 studies done with mice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available