4.3 Article

Equally weighted multivariate optimization of feeding rate for sub-yearling great sturgeon (Huso huso) using desirability function model

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE WORLD AQUACULTURE SOCIETY
Volume 53, Issue 3, Pages 693-702

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jwas.12857

Keywords

desirability function; feed conversion ratio; great sturgeon (Huso huso); optimum feeding rate; specific growth rate

Categories

Funding

  1. Isfahan University of Technology (Isfahan province, Iran)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to determine the optimum feeding rate for sub-yearling great sturgeons, and found that sturgeons with an initial weight of 94.01 grams achieved the best growth rate and feed conversion ratio at a feeding rate of 1.89% body weight per day.
Due to a lack of accurate information for appropriate sturgeon nutrition management, this study was conducted to determine the optimum feeding rate for sub-yearling great sturgeons (Huso huso) with an average initial weight of 94.01 +/- 4.36 g using the desirability function model. The feeding trial lasted for 60 days after acclimatization. This experiment was conducted in a completely randomized design with six different feeding rates (0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, and 3% of body weight day(-1)) and three replicates for each feeding level. Daily diet of each experimental tank was divided into three different meals. The average water flow rate for each experimental tank was 1.5 L min(-1) and the water temperature was adjusted to 22.7 +/- 1.1.4 degrees C. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on multivariate optimization of feeding rate based on both specific growth rate and feed conversion ratio by the desirability function model. Obtained results indicate that optimum specific growth rate, feed conversion ratio, and economic efficiency for sub-yearling great sturgeons with a weight range of 94.01 +/- 4.36 g up to 350.25 +/- 13.18 g occurred at a feeding rate of 1.89% body weight day(-1).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available