4.4 Article

Impulse response of underwater optical wireless channel in the presence of turbulence, absorption, and scattering employing Monte Carlo simulation

Publisher

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/JOSAA.435288

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Underwater optical wireless communication is a high-speed and high-bandwidth transmitting method at a lower cost compared with acoustic and radio methods. Absorption, scattering, and optical turbulence are three destructive phenomena that affect its performance. Computer simulations can be used to mimic the statistical behavior of underwater media and predict channel impulse response.
Recently, compared with acoustic and radio methods, underwater optical wireless communications has been considered as a high-speed and high-bandwidth transmitting method at a lower cost. Absorption, scattering, and optical turbulence are three destructive phenomena that affect the performance of underwater optical communi-cation systems. In this work, we use computer simulations to mimic the statistical behavior of underwater media employing the Monte Carlo method. Our simulation results for optical turbulence are in good agreement with the lognormal probability density function, which describes weak turbulence well, and they deviate as the turbulence moves away from weak. By considering the combined effect of absorption, scattering, and turbulence (AST) phe-nomena, we obtain the underwater channel's impulse response (IR). We demonstrate that there is no noticeable difference between the mean of ensemble IRs of the AST channel and the IR of the channel when turbulence is not taken into account. Moreover, our results predict that tripling the coastal link length from 10 to 30 m increases the average variance of sample IRs of the AST channel from their ensemble average by more than five times. (c) 2021 Optical Society of America

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available