4.7 Article

Thermodynamics of strain-induced crystallization in filled natural rubber under uni- and biaxial loadings, Part II: Physically-based constitutive theory

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2021.104712

Keywords

Filled natural rubber; Analytical network-averaging; Dynamics of strain-induced crystallization; Nonequilibrium; Calorimetric effect; Multiaxial tension

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A physically-based constitutive model and quantitative surface calorimetry method were introduced to study strain-induced crystallization in natural rubbers. The kinetics of phase transition outside of thermodynamic equilibrium was discussed to explain the mechanisms of nonequilibrium crystallization. The use of analytical network averaging for calculating multiaxial strain-induced crystallinity showed good agreement with experimental data.
To understand thoroughly the strain-induced crystallization in natural rubbers, conventional mechanical measurements are inadequate because they only provide a macroscopic relation between stress and strain. In this second part, a physically-based constitutive model for filled natural rubbers is coupled with the infrared thermography-based quantitative surface calorimetry (Part I) to shed new light on multiaxiality of strain-induced crystallization. In contrast to previous works, the kinetics of phase transition outside thermodynamic equilibrium is discussed. By introducing only two additional parameters (compared to the equilibrium crystallization theory), underlying mechanisms of nonequilibrium strain-induced crystallization can be well interpreted. To capture multiaxiality of strain-induced crystallinity, the analytical network averaging is utilized for the calculation of kinematic internal variables. Model predictions are then compared with comprehensive testing data (Part I) and demonstrate good agreement with these experiments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available