4.7 Article

Highly electrocatalytic activity Ruddlesden_Popper type electrode materials for solid oxide fuel cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages 490-498

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.10.028

Keywords

Solid oxide fuel cells; Cathode material; Ruddlesden-Popper oxide; Oxygen reduction reaction; Electrochemical performance

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51972100]
  2. Heilongjiang Provincial Fund for Distin-guished Young Scholars [JC2018014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By synthesizing and evaluating Ruddlesden-Popper oxides as potential cathode materials for SOFC, it was found that SLF10 exhibits high oxygen vacancy concentration and excellent electrocatalytic performance, leading to a higher maximum power density for the fuel cell.
To promote the viability of commercial solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC), developing novel oxygen electrodes with high electrochemical activity is essential. Herein, a series Ruddlesden-Popper oxides, Sr3_xLaxFe2O7_delta (SLFx), are successfully synthesized and evaluated as potential cathode materials for SOFC. The oxygen desorption behavior, electrochemical activity and oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) kinetics of the SLFx cathodes are systematically discussed. The Sr2.9La0.1Fe2O7_delta (SLF10) cathode exhibits highest oxygen vacancy concentration and excellent electrocatalytic performance, as evidenced by a low polarization resistance of 0.14 omega cm2 and high maximum power density of 0.77 W cm_ 2 at 700 degrees C. From electrochemical impedance spectra and distribution of relaxation times analysis, the oxygen adsorption/desorption process is the rate-limiting step toward ORR at the cathode interface. Furthermore, SLF10 shows considerable polarization overpotentials in both SOFC and solid oxide electrolysis cell (SOEC) modes, indicating that SLF10 is a promising bifunctional electrode for electrocatalytic oxygen reaction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available