4.6 Review

Review-Concentration Measurements In Molten Chloride Salts Using Electrochemical Methods

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 168, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/ac436a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. College of Engineering at Brigham Young University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The electrochemical measurement of concentration in molten chloride salts is essential for various industrial processes such as recycling and energy production. Different electrochemical techniques have their own advantages and limitations, with some, like CP and SWV, being more accurate at low concentrations while others, like OCP, yielding large errors in multianalyte mixtures.
The electrochemical measurement of concentration in molten chloride salts is a valuable tool for the control of existing and potential industrial processes, recycling of precious materials and energy production. The electrochemical techniques commonly used to measure concentration and each techniques' associated theory are discussed. Practices which improve measurement accuracy and precision are set forth. Exceptionally accurate and precise measurements published in the literature are evaluated based on their performance in specified concentration ranges. The strengths and weaknesses of the most accurate measurements are briefly explored. Chronopotentiometry (CP) and square wave voltammetry (SWV) are accurate and precise with low concentration measurements. SWV was accurate at low concentrations, even in multi-analyte mixtures. CP was accurate for only single analyte mixtures. Open-circuit potentiometry (OCP) is accurate and precise in single-analyte mixtures but yields large errors in multianalyte mixtures. Cyclic voltammetry (CV), chronoamperometry (CA) and normal pulse voltammetry (NPV) are accurate and precise across all concentration ranges. NPV is exceptionally well suited for measurements in melts with multiple electroactive species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available